Today's article is separated from the normal line of the blog, but I feel the need to write it in spite of everything.
And’ with great sadness that I learn that a few days ago was registered what could become a new order signed by the education ministers and Gelmini The Russian Defense (I would prefer to call the Minister of War), paramilitaries to introduce courses in high schools.
The next high school students will be able to learn how to shoot with airguns, archery and true survival pathways in full paramilitary style. Our future will resemble more and more high school students to Rambo that students, but watch the final pill, the test end of course consist of a “gara pratica di pattuglie fra studenti”.
This measure has already been commented online award by the people network, and as expected was rejected, defined as a return to the two decades, young table.
I should point out that the proposal is aimed at high school. Adolescents studying in high schools, of boys 15, 16, 17 years that have not yet fully formed. Teenage boys tend to manifest attitudes closer to violence simply because of a need to express themselves not yet conveyed. What would happen if these attitudes coltivassimo? Well, I'm not a psychologist, but the result we can easily imagine.
And if the money in that investiremmo “course” (which would lead credits) as we invest to improve research, to hire special teachers for disabled, to improve the educational workshops, or even just to buy toilet paper for schools? Honestly no one (the quasi) feel the need for a paramilitary course in high schools. If you own the Gelmini Ministers and La Russa are in doubt, they have the idea that they should hold a referendum.
It was Berlusconi who in some of his famous public speeches rightly called Italy, Country of the Renaissance. No country there equals in terms of museums, historical villas, art City, Borghi medievali, etc.. I wonder why we feel the need to make room for the muscles and brain toglierne.
Among other things, is a concern to me. It seems to me that it was just the right center to fight because the crucifix remains firmly to the walls of classrooms, “as a symbol of our roots and the Christian tradition”. The courses are not paramilitary contrast slightly with “the Word of the Lord”? On the other hand, Christ was for non-violence. At this point we could really remove the crucifix, I suggest instead of hanging in the halls of public schools a picture of Rambo or the A-Team instead of the Napolitano.
I also remember the article 11 of the Constitution. It, the famous one in which it is clearly expressed rejection of war as a means offensive. And’ so hard to bury violence?